Religion and Bioethics An Analysis of the Impact of Theological and Textualist Approaches to the Discipline

مقالۀ پژوهشی | صفحات: ۱ - ۱۱
  • محمد راسخ - 1. مركز تحقيقات ريزفناوری زيستی، پژوهشكدۀ فن‌آوری‌های نوين علوم پزشكی جهاددانشگاهی-ابن‌سينا، تهران، ايران. 2. استاد فلسفه و حقوق، دانشگاه شهيد بهشتی، تهران، ايران [m-rasekh@sbu.ac.ir]
  • امیرحسین خداپرست - استادیار موسسۀ پژوهشی حکمت و فلسفه ایران، تهران، ایران

چکیده

Background: Application of modern medical and bio sciences and also that of modern biotechnologies to human life, during the last decades, have left impact on and indeed changed traditional religious and moral attitudes. Use of such sciences and technologies has given rise to unprecedented moral and religious discussions which could not be justified and fruitful without taking into consideration of foundations of moral judgments. This is more significant in Islamic societies in which religion plays a considerable role in formation of moral beliefs and legal rules.
Methods: This research is a philosophical study by means of conceptual and critical analysis.
Results: Taking into account recent biotechnological developments and normative problems arising from them, it is necessary to study religious and moral approaches to these problems and evaluate various types of theorizing on bioethical problems.
Conclusion: In this paper, upon discussing and evaluating (religious) theological and textualist approaches to bioethics, it is attempted to put forth a justifiable religious approach to bioethical problems.

منابع:

  1. Shahryari H. Moral philosophy in the western thought from the perspective of Alasdair macintyre. 1st ed. Tehran: SAMT; 2006. 460 p.
  2. Malekian M. Moral and political views of macintyre. 1st ed. Tehran: Boq`e; 2000. 80 p.
  3. Ozawa T. What is Applied Ethics?. Cited 2011 June 27. Available from: https://kochi.repo.nii. ac.jp/?action=repository_uri&item_id=4387&file_id=17& file_no=1&nc_session=g707tkugu699l43ds2avmp6 cl7 [Accessed 9th December 2020].
  4. Peterson M. Reason and religious belief: an introduction to philosophy of religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1991. 326 p.
  5. Bouamrane Ch. [Le probleme de la liberte humaine dans La pensee musulmane: solution Mu` tazilite]. Paris: Vrin; 1978. 226 p. [French].
  6. Abdul Hye M. Ash`arism. In: Sharif MM. (ed.) History of Muslim philosophy. Kempten: Pakistan Philosophical Congress; 1963. p. 255-278.
  7. Plato. Euthyphro. In: Cooper JM. Hutchinson DS. Plato: Complete works. 1st ed. Indianapolis: Hackett Pub Co; 1997.
  8. Deal WE. Bioethics in Buddhism. In: Post SG. (ed.) Encyclopedia of bioethics. New York: Macmillan; 2004. p. 334-40.
  9. Naess A. The shallow and the deep, long‐range ecology movement. A summary. Inquiry. 1973;16:1-4, 95-100.
  10. Pojman LP. Environmental ethics: Readings in theory and application. 2nd ed. Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth; 1998. 568 p.
  11. Bryant J. Baggott la VL. Searle J. Introduction to bioethics. Wiley; 2005. 250 p.
  12. White L. The historical roots of our ecologic crisis. Science. 1967;155(3767):1203-7.
  13. Bobin Ch. Most Low: A meditation on the way of Francis of assisi. Norwich: Shambhala Publications Inc; 1997. 112 p.
  14. Bobin Ch. The very lowly: A meditation on Francis assist. Boston: New Seeds; 2006. 120 p.
  15. Peters T. Playing God? Genetic Determinism and Human Freedom. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2003. 260 p.
  16. Berg J. How could ethics depend on religion? In: Singer P, editor. A companion to ethics. Oxford: Blackwell; 1993. p. 525-34.
  17. Wierenga E. The nature of God: an inquiry into divine attributes. 1st ed. New York: Cornell University Press; 1989. 124 p.
  18. Atighetchi D. Islamic bioethics: problems and perspectives. 1st ed. Naple: Springer; 2007. 352 p.
  19. Hallaq WB. Authority, continuity and change in Islamic law. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001. 242 p.
  20. Hallaq WB. The origins and evolution of Islamic law. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005. 184 p.
  21. Novak D. Bioethics in Judaism. In: Stephen GP, editor. Encyclopedia of Bioethics. New York: Macmillan; 2004. p. 1346-7.
  22. Akhondi MM, Behjati Ardekani Z, Arefi S. An introduction to natural fertilization, non-natural fertilization and the necessity of using replacing gamete for infertility treatment. In: Gamete and embryo donation for infertility treatment. Tehran: SAMT; 2006. p. 9-39.
  23. Salimi T. Sperm (Gamete) donation and its Jurisprudential consequences [dissertation]. [Tehran]: Azad Islamic University, Olum Tahghighat; 2010.
  24. Sachedina A. Islamic biomedical ethics. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009. 265 p.
  25. Al-`Amoli ZBA. (Shahid Sani). Rasa’il Al-Shahid Sani. 1st ed. Qom: Daftar Tablighat Eslami; 2006.
  26. Rasekh M, Khodaparast AH. A right to know biological parents? J Reprod Infertil. 2007;8(3):247-58.
  27. Abdolazade A, Milanifar AR, Bejati Ardekani Z. Confidentiality in infertility treatment. Payesh. 2007;6(4):355-66.
  28. Nash RF. The rights of nature: A history of environmental ethics. 1st ed. Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press; 1989. 273 p.
  29. Nasr SH. Religion and the order of nature. 1st ed. New York: Oxford University Press. 310 p.
  30. Green RM. Morality and religion. In: Eliade M editor. The encyclopedia of religion. New York: Mac-millan; 1987. 554 p.
  31. Craig. W.L. The Indispensability of Theological Meta-Ethics Foundations for Morality. cited 2011 June 27, Available from: http://www.leaderu.com/ offices/billcraig/docs/meta-eth.html [Accessed 9th December 2020].
  32. Oppy G. Arguing about Gods. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006. 425 p.
  33. Stace WT. Religion and modern mind. 1st ed. New York: Lippincot; 1960. 285 p.
  34. Jones G, Cardinal D, Hayward J. Philosophy of religion. 1st ed. London: Hodder Murray; 2005. 236 p.
  35. Owen HP. The moral argument for Christian theism. 1st ed. London: George Allen and Unwin; 1965. 127 p.
  36. Taliaferro Ch. Contemporary philosophy of religion. 1st ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 1998. 448 p.
  37. Palmer M. The Question Of God: An Introduction And Sourcebook. 1st ed. London: Routledge; 2001. 357 p.
  38. Hepburn RW. Moral arguments for the existence of God. In: Edwards P, editor. Encyclopedia of philosophy; 1976. 382 p.
  39. Javadi M. Moral nature of religion. Naqd va Nazar. 1375: 2(6), [1996], p. 230-249.
  40. Rachels J. The elements of moral philosophy. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1999;232 p.
  41. Frankena W. Ethics. 2nd ed. Englewood cliffs: Prentice- Hall; 1973, 125 p.
  42. Khodaparast AH. A study of moral argument for the existence of God [master’s thesis]. [Tehran]: Theran University; 2009.
  43. Peterson M, Hasker W, Reichenbach B, Basinger D. Reason and religious belief: an introduction to philosophy of religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009, 350 p.
  44. Evans JH. Science, bioethics and religion. In: Harrison P, editor. Cambridge companion to science and religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010, 211 p.
  45. Khodaparast AH, Shrifi S, Milanifar AR, Behjati Ardekani Z. Moral problems of embryo donation. J Reprod Infertil. 2011;12(2):131-43.
  46. Rasekh M, Khodaparast AH. Bioethics and religion: abstract. 10th Asian symposium on bioethics and 4th Asia-Pacific session of UNESCO on ethics. Tehran: medical ethics and history of medicine research center of Tehran University; 2009. p. 14-5.
  47. Yusofi MA. Purposive approach in Imami Fiqh and an evaluation of its potentiality in providing an Islamic philosophy of law [master’s thesis]. [Tehran]: Shahid Beheshti University; 2010.

نحوه استناد

Rasekh M, Khodaparast AH. Religion and Bioethics An Analysis of the Impact of Theological and Textualist Approaches to the Discipline. Iran J Biomed Law Ethics. 2020;2(1):1-11.

Rasekh M, Khodaparast AH. Religion and Bioethics An Analysis of the Impact of Theological and Textualist Approaches to the Discipline. Iran J Biomed Law Ethics. 2020;2(1):1-11.